| Geoffrey Spear on Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:02:19 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] [s-d] Yes. |
On Dec 31, 2007 12:58 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Monday 31 December 2007 10:55:31 Mike McGann wrote: > > I claim this as Inconsistent to prevent the Oracularity. > > > > - Hose > > _______________________________________________ > > spoon-business mailing list > > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > > > > That will remove the rule "Rules", which is also inconsistent. Damned if you > do, damned if you don't. ;) > > H. Minister of Questions, could you submit a consultation concerning whether > or not I am the dictator? :p No it won't. If a Consultation is found to be Inconsistent, it's assigned to another Priest and the existing Answer and Oracularity are thrown out. I claim this answer was INCONSISTENT. -- Geoffrey Spear http://www.geoffreyspear.com/ _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business