Justin Ahmann on Thu, 27 Dec 2007 20:13:25 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Consultation 72: Answer |
I claim this answer to be CONSISTENT with the Cwn. Codae ----- Original Message ---- From: Adam Hill <adamahill@xxxxxxxxx> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 6:54:16 PM Subject: [s-b] Consultation 72: Answer Cheers, all. Here is my answer to Consultation 72: Answer: TRUE. Wooble sent a message to the Public Forum declaring his attempt to "deregister" as a Player. Rule 1-4 states that "A Player may cease to be a Player by Forfeiting the game" and provides no other means for leaving the game (except the removal of a Player with 3 support). A Player is an Outsider (Rule 1-4) and an Outsider is a Game Object (Rule 1-3). Rule 1-2 states that "Game Objects can only be created, destroyed, or modified if allowed by the Rules, in a manner explicitly governed by the Rules." In his attempt to "deregister" himself, Wooble tried to modify or destroy a Game Object in a manner that is not explicitly allowed by the Rules. He, thus, did not make a Game Action (see rule 1-10), and he was a Player at the time that Consultation 72 was submitted. Thanks, Anything McGee [[P.S.: Sorry, Hose, but they were fresh out of World War Z.]] > {{ > Was Wooble a Player at the time this Consultation was submitted? > }} > > Reasoning: > I believe that he is still a player. After the whole debacle about > pushing and hitting panic buttons, I'm assuming that an attempt to > "de-register" didn't do anything. Wooble did not forfeit and therefore > is still a Player. _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business