Re: [s-b] BobTHJ's Refresh Proposal

Roger Hicks on Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:11:17 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] BobTHJ's Refresh Proposal

To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-b] BobTHJ's Refresh Proposal
From: "Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:11:06 -0700
In-reply-to: <56732cfd0712102305y5b58343fj91d7c0dfc8012de4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <56732cfd0712102305y5b58343fj91d7c0dfc8012de4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 12/11/07, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The objective of this refresh proposal is to quickly remedy the
> problems with my previous RP. Honestly, a few minor tweaks is all that
> is required. This is not an official submission, merely a draft.
>
> Refresh Proposal (Draft)
I withdraw my Refresh Proposal (it was never actually submitted). I
urge anyone who favored my proposal to vote for Murphy's proposal.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

References:
- [s-b] BobTHJ's Refresh Proposal
  - From: Roger Hicks

Prev by Date: [s-b] Murphy's refresh proposal
Next by Date: [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal.
Previous by thread: [s-b] BobTHJ's Refresh Proposal
Next by thread: [s-b] meta-proposal: a theoretical framework for ending the Emergency without waiting
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread