Re: [s-b] Consultation 67 answers

["Aaron Coquet" <farfromunique@xxxxxxxxx>]

I claim this to be CONSISTENT. (AOL!!!)

On Dec 7, 2007 8:03 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I also claim this to be CONSISTENT.
>
> BobTHJ
>
>
> On Dec 7, 2007 7:32 AM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I claim this Consultation is CONSISTENT.
> >
> > --
> > 0x44;
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > > On Dec 7, 2007 9:08 AM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Consultation:
> > >> {{
> > >>     Is declaring Consultations 64, 65, and 66 for being irrelevant or
> > >> otherwise unworthy valid?
> > >>     Unbeliever: comex.
> > >> }}
> > >>
> > >> As MoQ I assign this consultation number 67. I appoint Wooble Priest.
> > >>
> > >
> > > I answer Consultation 67 "Yes".
> > >
> > > The Oracle's action in ZOTTING a Consultation as "otherwise unworthy"
> > > is always valid.
> > >
> > > I submit the following Oracularity is support of this Answer:
> > > {{
> > > BEGIN TRANSACTION
> > > /*Create a Blueprint for a Staff of Winning here, except I won't
> > > actually try that until we have Emergency Reform :-P */
> > >
> > > Consultations 64, 65, and 66 are ZOTTED.
> > >
> > > END TRANSACTION
> > > }}
> > >
> > > --Priest Wooble
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > spoon-business mailing list
> > > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> >
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>



-- 
Aaron C
"H. P. Lovecraft is Rock and Roll" -- Neil Gaiman
Don't Panic!
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business