[s-b] Consultation 67 answers

["Geoffrey Spear" <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Dec 7, 2007 9:08 AM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Consultation:
> {{
>     Is declaring Consultations 64, 65, and 66 for being irrelevant or
> otherwise unworthy valid?
>     Unbeliever: comex.
> }}
>
> As MoQ I assign this consultation number 67. I appoint Wooble Priest.

I answer Consultation 67 "Yes".

The Oracle's action in ZOTTING a Consultation as "otherwise unworthy"
is always valid.

I submit the following Oracularity is support of this Answer:
{{
BEGIN TRANSACTION
/*Create a Blueprint for a Staff of Winning here, except I won't
actually try that until we have Emergency Reform :-P */

Consultations 64, 65, and 66 are ZOTTED.

END TRANSACTION
}}

--Priest Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business