0x44 on Fri, 7 Dec 2007 15:08:36 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Consultation |
Consultation: {{ Is declaring Consultations 64, 65, and 66 for being irrelevant or otherwise unworthy valid? Unbeliever: comex. }} As MoQ I assign this consultation number 67. I appoint Wooble Priest. -- 0x44; comex wrote: > On 12/6/07, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I ZOT Consultations 64, 65, and 66 for being irrelevant >> and otherwise unworthy. >> > I declare this invalid :D > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business