Re: [s-b] Some Game Actions

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

ttpf

On Dec 6, 2007 10:05 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Dec 6, 2007 6:39 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > To answer your questions:
> >
> > <this question is a sentence fragment and thus has no answer>
> >
> > Mine
> >
> > I don't know.  If it is legal to transfer Panic Buttons, I have not.
> >  Otherwise, I have.
> >
> > I also submit the following Consultations:
> >
> > {
> > I write "X" on my Panic Button. is valid.
> > }
> >
> > {
> > I give my Panic Button to Goethe. is valid.
> > }
> >
> > {
> > I give my Panic Button to Wonko. is valid.
> > }
> >
> > {
> > I press pikhq's Panic Button, turning it On. is valid.
> > }
> >
> > {
> > Question:  Should the above Consultations, based on the Rules, be
> > ZOTTED?
> > Reasoning:  The format is explicitly condoned in Rule 1-10, but the
> > format also appears malformed (to the Supplicant).
> > Unbeliever: BobTHJ
> > }
> >
>
> The above Consultations are, with ascending Consultation Numbers from Top
> to Bottom of Codae's message, Consultations Number 59 to 63.
>
> As MoQ, I ZOT Consultations Number 59, 60, 61, and 62. Reasoning, which
> applies to each ZOTTING: This consultation is malformed because it contains
> ungrammatical sentence fragments.
>
> I assign Consultation Number 63 to Priest *Hose*. Despite the fact that
> the specific consultations referred to above have already been ZOTTED, the
> question in itself could apply to future cases.
>
> Billy Pilgrim
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business