Re: [s-b] Consultation 45 Answer; Blueprint

[Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I claim the answer to Proposal 45 to be INCONSISTENT with the "Rat Hole and Shampoo Store," where Claims of (in)consistency claim (in)consistency between a Consultation's Answer and the "Rat Hole and Shampoo Store."

Codae


----- Original Message ----
From: Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>
To: B Nomic business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 8:26:20 AM
Subject: Re: [s-b] Consultation 45 Answer; Blueprint

ttpf

Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Nov 25, 2007 11:08 AM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  
>>> A)
>>>
>>> {{
>>> Is it true that any player can define a blueprint?
>>> }}
>>>      
>> This is Consultation Number 45 and I assign it to Priest Wooble.
>>    
>
> I answer YES.
>
> While the rules don't explicitly allow the creation of Blueprints
> except by the Artisan, they don't forbid it, either.  Everyone who
> voted to foolishly repeal the Monopoly Rule may kick themselves.
>
>  
INCONSISTENT with established doctrine
This topic has already been discussed to the point that it's not even
funny anymore.

Shame on you Wooble!



_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business