Re: [s-b] Consultation 45 Answer; Blueprint

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/26/07, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Nov 25, 2007 11:08 AM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > A)
> > >
> > > {{
> > > Is it true that any player can define a blueprint?
> > > }}
> >
> >
> > This is Consultation Number 45 and I assign it to Priest Wooble.
>
> I answer YES.
>
> While the rules don't explicitly allow the creation of Blueprints
> except by the Artisan, they don't forbid it, either.  Everyone who
> voted to foolishly repeal the Monopoly Rule may kick themselves.
>
> I create the following unique Blueprint "How to scam the system":


WOW. Wooooooooooooooooow!

I claim Priest Wooble's answer to be RIDICULOUSLY INCONSISTENT with
established doctrine, and urge all fellow players of conscience to do
likewise!!!

I WOULD submit a consultation asking whether or not the Blueprint named "How
to scam the system", but I am afraid that pseudo-Artisan / pseudo-Oracle
(pseudo-GOD?) Wooble would feel empowered to ZOT said consultation before I
had the chance to assign it to a Priest.

By his reasoning, he could totally do that!!!

"The Artisan may, as a Game Action on behalf of the Ministry of Goods and
without 2 objections within 2 ndays, create a blueprint."

"Alternatively the Oracle may wield the staff of ZOT and cause the
Consultation to be ZOTTED"

Some thing, right?

Billy Pilgrim
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business