Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:50:12 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] Registration, consultation, proposal


Congrats on the reasoning, I love it.

I claim this to be CONSISTENT with established doctrine.

Keep the lasagna flying.

Billy Pilgrim

On Nov 26, 2007 8:17 AM, 0x4461736864617368 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If I were to claim this is consistent, would I subsequently lose the
> information about the judgment?
>
> --
> 0x4461736864617368;
>
>
>
> Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > On Nov 25, 2007 11:36 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Nov 21, 2007 12:10 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> The AFO submits a Consultation on the following statement:
> >>>
> >>>   If the Registrar attempts to refuse to allow an External Force to
> >>>   become a player after it has already become a player, does it
> >>>   thereby cease to be a player?
> >>>
> >>> Reasoning:
> >>>
> >>>   Rule 1-4 does not explicitly place any time limit on the Registrar's
> >>>   refusal.  Rule 3-1 prohibits retroactive changes, but explicitly
> >>>   allows their simulation.
> >>>
> >> This is Consultation Number 51, which I assign to Priest Wooble. (ouch)
> >>
> >
> > I answer Consultation Number 51 "NO".
> >
> > I hold that when the Registrar refuses to allow an External Force to
> > become a Player, that External Force was never a Player in the game of
> > B which follows this refusal.  The act of posting a message to the
> > Public Forum requesting to become a Player creates a superposition of
> > two games of B, one in which the External Force is a Player and one in
> > which he is not.  The Registrar's act of refusing registration
> > collapses the waveform, as does his addition of the External Force to
> > the Public Display of Players.  This effect is therefore not
> > retroactive, although it appears to be from the outside, as the game
> > of B with the varying status of the Player (or non-Player) in question
> > slips off into another Universe.  Keep the lasagna flying.
> >
> > --Priest Wooble
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business