Re: [s-b] Consultation 47

[Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sunday 25 November 2007 09:08:41 Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> > {{
> > Does a device (unique or not) need a corresponding, existing blueprint
> > to be defined?
> > }}
> >
> 
> This is Consultation Number 47 and I assign it to Priest pikhq.
> 
> Billy Pilgrim
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> 
By rule 3-12, a device must be defined, and a blueprint may be used to define 
it. However, it does not say that only a blueprint may define a device. So, 
anything that defines a device needs to be attached to a device, but this 
need not be a blueprint.

So, I answer consultation 47 NO.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business