Jamie Dallaire on Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:04:01 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] Agora & B


And now ttpf:

This is Consultation Number 44, which I ZOT for including a malformed
question and because the Supplicant has requested that the Consultation be
retracted (which, as far as I know, is impossible).

Billy Pilgrim

On Nov 25, 2007 11:02 AM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Nov 24, 2007 7:03 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I ask for consultation on the following:
> > {
> > Registrar Wooble does not have the power to allow Agora to become a
> > player by
> > Rule 1-4
> > }
> > Unbeliever: Wooble
> > Arguments: "The Registrar may refuse to allow any External Force to
> > become a
> > player, and may refuse to recognize any otherwise-legal name change, if
> > e
> > believes the External Force's proposed name (or existing player's new
> > name)
> > would be ambiguous or confusing, or could otherwise damage the integrity
> > of
> > this game."
> > This does not give the Registrar carte blanche license to refuse a new
> > player:
> > this only gives the Registrar the power to refuse a name that is
> > ambiguous,
> > confusing, or damages the integrity of the game. Since Agora is none of
> > these, the Registrar does not have the power to refuse Agora's status as
> > a
> > player under this rule.
> > There is no other rule that gives the Registrar the power to refuse a
> > new
> > player.
>
>
> This is Consultation Number 44, which I ZOT for including a malformed
> question and because the Supplicant has requested that the Consultation be
> retracted (which, as far as I know, is impossible).
>
> Billy Pilgrim
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business