Jamie Dallaire on Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:04:01 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Agora & B |
And now ttpf: This is Consultation Number 44, which I ZOT for including a malformed question and because the Supplicant has requested that the Consultation be retracted (which, as far as I know, is impossible). Billy Pilgrim On Nov 25, 2007 11:02 AM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Nov 24, 2007 7:03 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I ask for consultation on the following: > > { > > Registrar Wooble does not have the power to allow Agora to become a > > player by > > Rule 1-4 > > } > > Unbeliever: Wooble > > Arguments: "The Registrar may refuse to allow any External Force to > > become a > > player, and may refuse to recognize any otherwise-legal name change, if > > e > > believes the External Force's proposed name (or existing player's new > > name) > > would be ambiguous or confusing, or could otherwise damage the integrity > > of > > this game." > > This does not give the Registrar carte blanche license to refuse a new > > player: > > this only gives the Registrar the power to refuse a name that is > > ambiguous, > > confusing, or damages the integrity of the game. Since Agora is none of > > these, the Registrar does not have the power to refuse Agora's status as > > a > > player under this rule. > > There is no other rule that gives the Registrar the power to refuse a > > new > > player. > > > This is Consultation Number 44, which I ZOT for including a malformed > question and because the Supplicant has requested that the Consultation be > retracted (which, as far as I know, is impossible). > > Billy Pilgrim > _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business