Re: [s-b] spoon-business Digest, Vol 43, Issue 20

Peter Cooper Jr. on Fri, 3 Aug 2007 05:53:13 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] spoon-business Digest, Vol 43, Issue 20

To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-b] spoon-business Digest, Vol 43, Issue 20
From: "Peter Cooper Jr." <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 08:53:07 -0400 (EDT)
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
In-reply-to: <f917c97a0707270437w6aa81cf3w11fdbdfe219fa586@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <mailman.0.1185476402.1622.spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx> <f917c97a0707270437w6aa81cf3w11fdbdfe219fa586@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.10 [CVS]

Ted Ofner wrote:
> Consultation 27: TRUE
> Consultation 28: FALSE

As much as I wish the opposite were true, I claim these consultations to
be inconsistent. We've pretty much established Primo as a Player and not
as a Faction, and my props that try to remove it as a player haven't
passed. While I'd be happy for something to change Primo to be a Faction
instead of a Player, a Consultation with justification of "it looks like
one" isn't the way to do it.

-- 
Peter C.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

Prev by Date: Re: [s-b] Ballot for nweek 128
Next by Date: Re: [s-b] Ballot for nweek 128
Previous by thread: Re: [s-b] consultation 30 (assigned to Peter)
Next by thread: [s-b] Proposal: Repeal Temporal Prime Directive
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread