[s-b] proposal: only human players may vote

[Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>]

My main objection to having corporation style players is the potential 
for abuse in voting.

Therefore I propose the following:

title: Players should be Humane
{

amend rule 1-4 by replacing:
{
An External Force may become a Player by posting a message to a Public 
Forum containing a request to become a Player and a uniquely identifying 
name that e wishes to be known by. E may do this if and only if e 
fulfills the following requirements:

     * E is capable of passing a Turing Test
     * E is not currently a Player
     * E has a working e-mail address
}
with:
{
An External Force may become a Player by posting a message to a Public 
Forum containing a request to become a Player and a uniquely identifying 
name that e wishes to be known by. E may do this if and only if e 
fulfills the following requirements:

     * E is capable of passing a Turing Test
     * E is not currently a Player
     * E has a working e-mail address

A Human Player is a Player that fulfills the following requirements:

     * E is a human being
}

amend rule 2-2 by replacing:
{
Any Player may submit a Vote on an Open proposal at any time. The Vote 
must be one of the words FOR, AGAINST, or ABSTAIN; other words are ignored.

The most recent Vote on a proposal by a Player is called that player's 
Final Vote on that proposal.
}
with :
{
Any Human Player may submit a Vote on an Open proposal at any time. The 
Vote must be one of the words FOR, AGAINST, or ABSTAIN; other words are 
ignored.

The most recent Vote on a proposal by a Player is called that Player's 
Final Vote on that proposal.
}

amend rule 2-5 by replacing:
{
When a Priest submits eir Answer to a Consultation, within three ndays 
(or ndelays if the clock is off) since it's submission, any player 
except the Defendant and the Supplicant may, as a Game Action, make a 
Claim as to the Answer's Consistency with established doctrine. Such 
Claims will ultimately state that the player believes the answer to be 
Consistent or Inconsistent.
}
with:
{
When a Priest submits eir Answer to a Consultation, within three ndays 
(or ndelays if the clock is off) since it's submission, any Human Player 
except the Defendant and the Supplicant may, as a Game Action, make a 
Claim as to the Answer's Consistency with established doctrine. Such 
Claims will ultimately state that the Player believes the answer to be 
Consistent or Inconsistent.
}
}

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business