Daniel Lepage on Tue, 26 Jun 2007 06:21:49 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-b] Fwd: Oracle Report 26/07 |
A toast: To Business! -- Wonko ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Jun 26, 2007 9:21 AM Subject: Re: [s-b] Oracle Report 26/07 To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > Consultation 15 > Supplicant: Antonio > { > The rules of B Nomic allow BobTHJ to act on behalf of the group of > persons knows as "Primo Corporation", True of False ? > Unbeliever: BobTHJ > } > Assigned to: Wonko (no other player eligible) > > Priest' Reasoning: I rule this TRUE. This question is independent of whether or not Primo Corporation is a player. Our rules permit BobTHJ to act on behalf of Primo Corporation for the same reason they permit Bill Gates to act on behalf of Microsoft - they are External Forces, existing outside the game and thus not subject to our rules. If asked, "Can the player BobTHJ act on behalf of the player Primo Corporation", I would say NO on the grounds that Primo Corporation should not be a player; however, as it has already been ruled that Primo Corporation is a player, there is nothing in the rules that prevents a component of a player from presenting the actions of the entire player, any more than the rules forbid my hands from acting on behalf of myself. > -o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o- > > Consultation 18 > Supplicant: Antonio > Question: > { > true or false: there exists a proposal numbered 105 ? > } > reasoning: > { > I don't think that Zach's "fastness" proposal ever reached the public > forum. > } > Assigned to: Wonko TRUE. At least one version of it did: http://lists.ellipsis.cx/archives/spoon-business/spoon-business-200706/msg00015.html While this prop did not use conventional delimiters, it was still clearly indicated as a proposal. -- Wonko _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business