Re: [s-b] nweek 113 ballot

[shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx]

> 21      The Temporal Prime Directive
FOR.  [[although I'm a little suspicious of what a "simulated
retroactive change" might be.]]

> 22      You need to *work* to win
AGAINST.  [[obviously, since I would lose a win and the "gold rush"
didn't happen.]]

> 23      Legal Mode
AGAINST.

> 24      Monopoly Mode
FOR.  [[I've been swayed by Wonko's arguments.]]

> 25      Win or Win or Win
FOR.

> 26      Disambiguation
FOR.

> 27      Jurisdictional boundaries
AGAINST.  [[would screw up posts.]]

> 28      The Slim Shady Clause
AGAINST.  [[too confusing.]]

> 29      Generality
AGAINST.  [[still not happy with the complexity of the wording; sorry.]]

> 30      some RFJ fixes
FOR.  [[yes!]]

> 31      populate $wgLogo
FOR.

> 32      Proposal to reduce redundancy (which will be reduced by passing this proposal)
ABSTAIN.

> 33      Posts
FOR.

> 34      The rot sets in
ABSTAIN.  [[Do I want to see if anyone votes for it?  Assuredly.  Do I
want to be the looney that voted it in?  I don't think so.]]

> 35      The Rules Rule
AGAINST.  [[aren't the rules themselves game objects?]]

> 36      extend commentability options
AGAINST.  [[not needed.]]

> 37      conflicts and dependencies
FOR.

> 38      you know you want 'em
AGAINST.  [[In proposals, yes.  In game actions?  I'd rather not.]]

> 39      state of the union
AGAINST.  [[for the same reasons as 38.]]

> 40      Rename comex, too
FOR.

> 41      Basic Scoring
FOR.  [[I *love* this.]]

> 42      Emergency Procedure Fixes
FOR.

> 43      Monotonicity is rather dull, don't you think?
ABSTAIN.  [[No game effect.  Why?]]

> 44
FOR.


Optional.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business