Chuck Adams on Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:25:35 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] nweek 113 ballot |
Since we can change our votes, disregard my previous votes. Here's my new ones: Peter Cooper Jr. wrote: > The following proposals are now open for voting: > > 21 The Temporal Prime Directive FOR > 22 You need to *work* to win FOR > 23 Legal Mode AGAINST > 24 Monopoly Mode FOR > 25 Win or Win or Win FOR > 26 Disambiguation FOR > 27 Jurisdictional boundaries FOR > 28 The Slim Shady Clause FOR > 29 Generality FOR > 30 some RFJ fixes FOR > 31 populate $wgLogo AGAINST [[I'd rather see a general rule that addresses the web site and empowers the admin to design the look and feel]] > 32 Proposal to reduce redundancy (which will be reduced by passing > this proposal) AGAINST [[I still don't have the 'Player' property, so I wouldn't get a spiffy pioneer badge either]] > 33 Posts FOR > 34 The rot sets in AGAINST [[my simple unfrozen caveman mind is frightened and confused by it]] > 35 The Rules Rule FOR > 36 extend commentability options FOR > 37 conflicts and dependencies AGAINST > 38 you know you want 'em FOR > 39 state of the union AGAINST > 40 Rename comex, too FOR > 41 Basic Scoring FOR > 42 Emergency Procedure Fixes FOR > 43 Monotonicity is rather dull, don't you think? FOR > 44 FOR [[I'm not sure I'd want points getting awarded in the future for typo/grammo fixing however]] _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business