automailer on Sat, 7 Jan 2006 17:31:57 -0600 (CST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-b] [auto] Triller amends p323 |
Triller has amended p323. --------------------------------- Motion 323/2: Words Of Nomic Derivation Remain Off Unabridged Syntax Lexicon. Yawp! A Proposal by Triller Last modified on nweek 103, nday 8 323/1: Gibberish Named Objects Merit Emphatic Stipulations Proposal Proposed by Triller on nday 3, nweek 103. [[ GNOMES ]] [[ This in response to comex's attempt to set the Gibberish Word to the name of an Object which already exists. I don't see that this is illegal. 9-15 says "a word used in a rule in the ruleset...", but doesn't extend that to Objects. ]] [[ r/1 per comex's worthy comment ]] [[ r/2 to address Peter's concerns - deleted BDict inclusion - added action for zyxabee ]] [[ Include single word Game Objects in Nomic Words ]] Add the following bullet to Rule 9-15: {{ * a single word that is the name of a Game Object or type of Game Object }} [[ Preclude allowing a player to change the Gibberish word to Nomic Word (i.e. the name of an Object that already exists). If our reference dictionary happens to suddenly include an entry that is the current Gibberish Word we'll have to live with that. ]] Insert after the second paragraph of Rule 9-16: {{ The Gibberish Word may not be changed to an English Word or a Nomic Word. }} [[ Preclude the Gibberish word from being the name of a Talisman that already exists. I can see myriad problems stemming from this act. ]] If Proposal 318 passed, change the Gibberish Word to {{ Axebezy }}. Triller --------------------------------- This Message was sent automatically by the Wiki. Please do not reply to the sender of this message, as your replies will be ignored. Thank you. _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business