RE: [s-b] Referendum Passage + Nweek 101 Voting Results

["Mark Walsh" <flutesultan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On: 12/4/05 12:42:20 PM Peter sent:
> Subject: [s-b] Referendum Passage + Nweek 101 Voting Results
> 
> And now for the proposals that were just voted on:
>  ....
> Triller 
> 50A 12GC
>  
> Peter 
> 48A 6GC
>  
> Although, Triller and I may have Amplitude Amplifiers in time to
> double our Amplitude from this.
> 
> Peter C.

This is a little tougher to resolve.
Clearly Peter gains double Amplitude. Eir Amplitude
Amplifier completed Forging at the end of nDay 8 last nWeek.
Triller is another matter.
I could cite this bullet in 2-2 regarding precedence:

* If one of the abilities is on a Rule, and the other 
is not, then the one that is not on a Rule takes precedence. 

However, it becomes a question of whether or not e in fact
had the Talisman before the Props resolved.

By this bullet in 2-2:
* If both of the abilities are on a Rule, and those Rules 
are held by different Sections, then the Rule within the 
section with the lower section number takes precedence 
over the other. 

The Proposals resolve at the end of the nWeek by 3-3.
Scoring (i.e. awarding of Amplitude) is defined in 3-4,
and occurs when a proposal passes (see 3-3).
By 7-2, Forging completes at the end of nDay 12.

So, I believe that amplitude for voting and passing props
is awarded before forging of talismans completes by the
above citation.

Triller does not receive double A bonuses for last nWeek's
Voting & Proposing.

See comex! 50 seconds can make quite a difference!

Triller

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business