Daniel Peter Lepage on Sat, 11 Jun 2005 00:55:22 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] A win and a loophole. |
> I submit the following CFI: > > {{ __DQT and the English Language__ > > Plaintiff: The Voice > Defendant: Dyslexic Q-Thief > > Statement: The purchases of 100 fort sections, 10^100 sentry guns, a > Capacitors, an Advanced Targeting, a Shield Overload, and Steam Tower > Upgrade made by DQT fail because e did not have enough genechips. > > Analysis by Plaintiff: DQT's reasoning was that nowhere in the rules > did it say that players had to pay for add-ons they buy. Buy is > defined by the M-W dictionary as "to acquire possession, ownership, or > rights to the use or services of by payment especially of money ." I > argue that this definition of the English word 'buy,' given that there > is no other definition of the word in the B Nmc Unbrdgd Dctnry, > implies that some sort of financial or monetary compensation is > required to 'buy' something. Therefore, it does not need to be said > in the rules that a player needs to pay for something e buys, and > DQT's purchase fails. > }} > > This CFI is recognized, and is now Open. I rule YES on this CFI. The phrase "purchasing cost" clearly indicates that it's the cost of purchasing it, and the rule should be interpreted accordingly. -- Wonko _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business