automailer on Fri, 13 May 2005 23:38:00 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-b] [auto] Wonko votes


Wonko's votes:
Proposal 58/3: Egads! Let's effect proposals here, averting Nomic tragedies [[ELEPHANT]] : For
Proposal 59/1: More than you can chew                   : For
To be honest, the point of this was to force Raelus to dump all eir SP before the end of the nweek. But p58 seems to have negated that. Still, it's a simple solution to the problem of one player pwning all souls: if e does so, e burns.

Proposal 60/0: Teamwork? In a Nomic?                    : For
Proposal 61/1: Chads                                    : Against
Too dangerous. If you and I both forge them, I can give you mine and you'll be celestially smited off the entire ballot for that nweek.

Proposal 62/0: Fluffy Bunnies... Of DOOM!               : For
Proposal 63/2: Cityscape is the young subgame coming again, propsed even!  : Against
Proposal 64/0: Dueling is too random.                   : Against
Proposal 65/2: **The Baron's Story, Chapter One** Lengthiness Is Because It Does Oodles [[LIBIDO]] : For
Proposal 66/2: Inflation Strikes, Seemingly Under Everyone's Schnozz [[ISSUES]] : For
Proposal 67/0: "What A Silly Technicality," E Declared [[WASTED]] : For
Proposal 68/0: Save Time And Propose Less Edict         : For
Proposal 69/3: Subgames In New Ecstasy [[SINE]]         : For
Proposal 70/0: Deputy Insertion; Vacation Emminent      : Against
I think we need a way to vote "semi-for" something: if it passes only on semiphore votes, the effects happen but it doesn't get any bonuses. I think the content is good, but I really don't like giving out Genechips for absolutley everything, especially when the title doesn't make sense. What's so eminent about your vacation?

Proposal 71/2: Story props are working now!             : For
Proposal 72/0: The Voting Gremlin                       : For
I see Diebold's function has changed a bit over time.

Proposal 73/0: Additional Points for passed proposals   : For
Proposal 74/1: This is a Shakespearean Sonnet           : Against
Proposal 75/1: Proposal is conditional and neato.       : Against
It spells "Pican", not "Pecan". There's no such thing as a "ballot". The Yummy Carrot seems practically worthless, and the change at the end is a complete non sequitur. I'm also tired, sick, and I have a headache. Bah.

Proposal 76/1: Grammar nazi on my [[rear]]end.          : Against
Too tired to figure out what this changes. Comments would be helpful.

Proposal 77/0: I'd make an acronym later                : For
Proposal 78/1: Join up, thou slitherer!                 : Against
My scripts can't handle negative votes. And what's the title supposed to mean?

Proposal 79/3: Da Initial Card Edition [[Dice]]         : For
Proposal 80/2: Aww, ickle fluffy bunnies... Yumm!       : Against
Huh?

Proposal 81/2: Yellow                                   : For
Boy, I'm gonna regret voting for this.

Proposal 82/2: Heroes                                   : Abstain
It probably does what it's supposed to, but I can't tell. Don't quite follow cards. Too many new rules.

Proposal 83/0: I can't let me get away with that        : For
I will not rest until I have been brought to justice.

Proposal 84/2: I need some extra time.                  : For
Proposal 85/0: Filibusters, redux                       : For
Proposal 86/0: Sonnets need iambs, please!              : For
Nice title acronym.


This Message was sent automatically by the Wiki.
 Please do not reply to the sender of this message, as your replies will be ignored. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business