Jeremy Cook on Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:31:13 -0600 (CST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] Looptek (Win) |
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 03:25:36PM -0500, Daniel Lepage wrote: > > I think you're right about being able to modify rules, etc. I also > think you meant r10/4, not 11/4 (11/4 defines rulebooks). However, > r10/4 says that proposals and actions may not suppress rules; it says > nothing about other rules. Indeed, to claim that r27 has effect despite > being deactivated is to suppress rule 1085, which asserts that > deactivated rules have no effect. > > So unless somebody challenges your actions, I would say you now have > 1000 points but cannot Win with them. Eir actions were not legal. See my post earlier today. Zarpint _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business