Jeremy Cook on Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:31:13 -0600 (CST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] Looptek (Win)


On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 03:25:36PM -0500, Daniel Lepage wrote:
> 
> I think you're right about being able to modify rules, etc. I also 
> think you meant r10/4, not 11/4 (11/4 defines rulebooks). However, 
> r10/4 says that proposals and actions may not suppress rules; it says 
> nothing about other rules. Indeed, to claim that r27 has effect despite 
> being deactivated is to suppress rule 1085, which asserts that 
> deactivated rules have no effect.
> 
> So unless somebody challenges your actions, I would say you now have 
> 1000 points but cannot Win with them.

Eir actions were not legal. See my post earlier today.

Zarpint
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business