| Jeremy Cook on Wed, 3 Nov 2004 22:04:33 -0600 (CST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] CFI: All is Not Made Right. |
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 10:54:05PM -0500, Bryan Donlan wrote: > On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 21:39:49 -0600, Araltaln <araltaln@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 22:21:35 -0500, Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Well, obviously I'm not capable of that, since I'm still not convinced > > > that they weren't legal even without this scam. Anyway, it doesn't > > > matter whether I can figure it out now; the important thing is whether > > > I could figure it out then, and it seems I couldn't. > > > > > > And even if I had, you'd have no way of knowing. > > > > You knew to invoke r699 when you originally attempted the actions, I'd > > argue that that indicates you knew they weren't legal. > > It also implies he knew it'd be legal if he used r699. But he hadn't used it yet. I appeal this. Zarpint _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business