Re: [s-b] Nweek 68 Ballot

["Glotmorf" <dwhytock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 29 Aug 2004 at 13:02, Daniel Lepage wrote:

> The following measures are on the ballot for nweek 68:
> 
>   Proposal 1899/0: Technological Go (Zarpint)

Yes.

>   Proposal 1900/0: Python Enterprises (Zarpint)

This hasn't changed since the last time I voted shelve on it.  
I now vote no.

>   Proposal 1901/0: Card balancing act (Zarpint)

Shelve.  I still don't know what constitutes the definition of 
a card these days; as far as I can tell, since card 
definitions don't exist as separate objects, the definitions 
of the cards Zarpint wants to add will cease to exist when 
this proposal destroys all existing copies of them, which 
means the proposal won't be able to add them back.

>   Proposal 1902/0: Reworking Cards (Wonko)

Shelve.  Similar issues to the p1901: if some card definitions 
are going to be formally created, what happens with legacy 
cards that have no formal definitions created?  For that 
matter, what, in the context of the rules, is a "card 
definition"?

>   Proposal 1903/0: Let em do eir job! (Wonko)

Yes.  However, do we want to more explicitly separate 
ministerial duties from non-ministerial duties?  That way 
questions of double-duty redundancy don't come up.

>   Proposal 1904/0: A Minister of Proposals (Wonko)

Shelve.  Isn't this maybe *too* cushy a job?

>   Proposal 1905/0: A Minister Of Cards (Wonko)

Shelve.  This proposal says "Ministry of Change" instead of 
"Ministry of Cards".

						Glotmorf

-----
The Ivory Mini-Tower: a blog study in Social Technology.
http://www.nomic.net/~dwhytock/imt

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business