Re: [Spoon-business] NWEEK 56 BALLOT (Corrected)

[SkArcher <SkArcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 00:17:12 -0600 (CST), David E. Smith 
<dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The following measures are on the ballot for nweek 56:
>
> Proposal 1756/0: Age before Beauty (Wild Card)
YES

> Proposal 1757/2: For the Love of Bob (The Pusher Robot)
NO
NO (selective Lobbyist)

> Proposal 1758/0: Repeal of the LOSA (Wild Card)
NO

> Proposal 1759/1: The Council Revisited (Wonko)
YES. I vote this way because by my count this splits the vote 3 vs 3 with 
1 SHELVE vote, and so it will be shelved until the age groups are sorted 
out but I still get a contrary vote point.

> Proposal 1760/0: Political Tafl (Teucer)
NO

> Proposal 1761/0: Allowing Actions Again (Wonko)
ABSTAIN

> Proposal 1762/0: Standardized Elections (Wonko)
YES. same reasoning as 1759. you need to fix the vote counting method as 
it is rather nasty atm (may I suggest a direct sequential elimination?)

> Proposal 1764/1: Nevinyrral's Disk (SkArcher)
YES

> Proposal 1765/0: Untitled Prop by SkArcher (SkArcher)
YES

> Proposal 1766/0: Gender Fix (Zarpint)
ABSTAIN

> Proposal 1767/0: Pseudocoding is not a crime (Zarpint)
NO
NO (selective Lobbyist)

I think it should stay a crime

> Proposal 1768/1: Rewarding Strangeness (Zarpint)
NO. I don't like this and I see no need for it, but its a contrary vote 
point.

> Proposal 1769/0: Attributes are very Stylish (Zarpint)
YES. And why not. I believe it gets shelved though.

> Proposal 1770/0: Once More, With Less Suckage (Baron von Skippy)
NO. That, if you will excuse me pointing it out, Sucks.



SkArcher
 
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business