Rob Speer on 7 Aug 2003 19:14:57 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Spoon-business] CFIs |
I make whichever of the following judgments are possible (as in, the ones that the Upper House is to decide): CFI 1616 Judgment: TRUE Rationale: Well, you _are_. CFI 1620 Judgment: TRUE Rationale: I don't get the complaint about "game objects". The same statement could even be made comparing a failure clause in a proposal to a failure clause in another game object. I could change my name to "Whenever A Proposal Fails I Win" or something and it would have the same effect. (As in nothing, because neither a name nor a failed proposal has the force of rule.) CFI 1626 Judgment: TRUE Rationale: Yeah, Rule 13 is pretty badly written. -- Rob Speer _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business