Re: [Spoon-business] Proposal

[SkArcher <SkArcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

22/07/2003 22:14:57, Jonathan David Amery <jdamery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>I'm pretty sure the Failure Scam doesn't work, but...
>
>I propose the following proposal:
>
>{{
>__Exploit it as far as we can go__
>
>If this proposal passes, or if it fails, then create a rule, with
>identification number -1 with the following text: 
>{{ {* Layer 6, Chutzpah 11 *}
>__Rulership and Mastery__
>
>No change may be made to the rules unless a majority of the members of
>the society named "Scammers for a Better Tomorrow" announce on a public
>forum that they are willing for the change to be made.  Voting in
>favour of the change is considered to be such an announcement.
>
>A state of emergency may not be entered into unless a majority of the
>members of the society named "Scammers for a Better Tomorrow"
>recognise it.
>
>This rule may be changed at any time by the society named the society
>named "Scammers for a Better Tomorrow".
>
>This rule takes precidence over any rule that would otherwise conflict
>with it.
>}}
>
>}}

Interesting. But you missed a trick.

I propose;

{{__lets not__

If this proposal passes, or even if it fails, Create a rule, with the identification number -2 and with the 
following text:

{{ {* Layer 7, Chutzpah 99 *}

__Bow Down Before The One You Serve__

The Charter of the Society 'Scammers for a Better Tomorrow' (aka SBT) may not be changed.

Players may not become members of the Society 'Scammers for a Better Tomorrow' (aka SBT).

Any Players already members of 'Scammers for a Better Tomorrow' (aka SBT) are removed from the societys roster.

}}


SkArcher


_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business