SkArcher on 19 Jul 2003 05:31:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Spoon-business] Hardening the Circuit breaker Prop |
I just realised that this only went to -discuss, and has a certain flaw so here it is on -business, rectified ------- Start of forwarded message ------- From: SkArcher <SkArcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Fwd: Re: RE: [spoon-discuss] My missing prop Date: 19/07/2003 04:49:48 19/07/2003 04:43:47, "Craig" <ragnarok@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>Heh. Interesting. I sent my profit prop to >>>>spoon-business one minute before the Baron did (I >>>>could do it faster, since all I did was claim a win), >>>>but it's not there yet because I sent it from the >>>>wrong email address...Soon as Joel passes it through, >>>>I'll have pre-empted the Baron's win... >>> >>>Remember, Glotmorf, you have to get past both Wonko's win and mine before >>>we >>>get to any end-of-nweek proposal victories. >>> >>>You could just recognize an SoE now, on the theory that by golly >*somebody* >>>has just won. > >>Actually, no. Whether or not Wonko's win is recognized doesn't have >anything to do with the ballot. My prop will remain. > >If Wonko or I won, then you can't win - unless you have a clause like the >Baron's, the circuit breaker has been flipped. It is possible that the circuit breaker needs to a little more difficult to remove, so... I propose; {{__Power Outage__ change the text of rule 851 to read; The following rule is created immediately after anyone is awarded a Win: {{ __No Win For You__ {* Win, 9 *} Players may not win. This rule may not be repealed in the nweek it is created or the nweek after it is created. }} }} -------- End of forwarded message -------- _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business