| SkArcher on 19 Jul 2003 05:31:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| [Spoon-business] Hardening the Circuit breaker Prop |
I just realised that this only went to -discuss, and has a certain flaw so here it is on -business, rectified
------- Start of forwarded message -------
From: SkArcher <SkArcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Fwd: Re: RE: [spoon-discuss] My missing prop
Date: 19/07/2003 04:49:48
19/07/2003 04:43:47, "Craig" <ragnarok@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>Heh. Interesting. I sent my profit prop to
>>>>spoon-business one minute before the Baron did (I
>>>>could do it faster, since all I did was claim a win),
>>>>but it's not there yet because I sent it from the
>>>>wrong email address...Soon as Joel passes it through,
>>>>I'll have pre-empted the Baron's win...
>>>
>>>Remember, Glotmorf, you have to get past both Wonko's win and mine before
>>>we
>>>get to any end-of-nweek proposal victories.
>>>
>>>You could just recognize an SoE now, on the theory that by golly
>*somebody*
>>>has just won.
>
>>Actually, no. Whether or not Wonko's win is recognized doesn't have
>anything to do with the ballot. My prop will remain.
>
>If Wonko or I won, then you can't win - unless you have a clause like the
>Baron's, the circuit breaker has been flipped.
It is possible that the circuit breaker needs to a little more difficult to remove, so...
I propose;
{{__Power Outage__
change the text of rule 851 to read;
The following rule is created immediately after anyone is awarded a Win:
{{ __No Win For You__ {* Win, 9 *}
Players may not win.
This rule may not be repealed in the nweek it is created or the nweek after it is created.
}}
}}
-------- End of forwarded message --------
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business