Re: [Spoon-business] Re: [spoon-discuss] unintentional loophole?

["Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 3/7/03 at 1:53 PM Baron von Skippy wrote:

>>Glotmorf, who was randomly selected for the seat whose election takes
>>place this nweek, has not chosen to run for "re" election.  Nobody else
>>has chosen to run for that seat either, which means that after this nweek,
>>the 3-player Council will have only two players.
>
>-I declare myself to be a candidate for Glotmorf's soon-to-be vacated
>Council of Elders seat. Don't know if it's legal, but I do it anyway.-

I maintain that nothing is forcing me from being vacated from the seat, and that in fact now that the time for the election for the seat has passed it's not my seat that's up for election.

However, on the offchance that my seat *is* up for election, I declare myself to be a candidate for re-election to it.

If my seat is *not* up for election, I declare myself to be a candidate for election to the next seat due for election, on the grounds that there is nothing in the rule that says I can't hold more than one seat.

So there.

						Glotmorf

-----
The Ivory Mini-Tower: a cyber-anthropologist's blog
http://ix.1sound.com/ivoryminitower

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business