Glotmorf on 20 Oct 2002 07:08:02 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [Spoon-business] CFI: Society Chutzpah |
Mr. A...I rescinded CFI 1103 before you recognized it. The email for that was the same one that created CFI 1106, as shown below: On 10/4/02 at 11:23 AM Glotmorf wrote: >On 10/4/02 at 9:15 AM Glotmorf wrote: > >>I make the following CFI: >> >>Statement: Rule 578 has a Chutzpah of 2. >> >>Analysis: >> >>Part of the text of Rule 578 includes, near the beginning of subsection F, >>the text, "(Chutzpah 2)". As there is no provision for a subsection >>having its own Chutzpah, this Chutzpah statement must apply to the >>entirety of Rule 578. >> >>That the text "(Chutzpah 2)" appears in the text of Rule 578 is sufficient >>for the purposes of Rule 33 to indicate Rule 578's Chutzpah is other than >>1. > >I rescind this CFI. Funny...I thought Rule 497 had been repealed. > >I do make the following CFI, though: > >Statement: Members of a Society may vote, regardless of whether or not >they are players, in order to cast a "yes" vote on their Society's >proposals. > >Analysis: > >Rule 497 says individual subsections of rules can have their own Chutzpah. > >Rule 578 subsection F has a Chutzpah of 2. > >Rule 578 subsection F says Members of a Society auto-vote "Yes" on the >Society's proposals. > >Rule 15 says game entities other than players may vote if permitted to by >a rule with a higher Chutzpah. > >Therefore, members of a Society can vote, inasmuch as they can cast a >"Yes" vote on that Society's proposals. > > Glotmorf > > >_______________________________________________ >spoon-business mailing list >spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx >http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business