Glotmorf on 19 Jul 2002 00:36:03 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Spoon-business] The Daily Recognizer (Thursday morning)


On 7/18/02 at 3:12 PM David E. Smith wrote:

>Glotmorf rules on CFI874. (The reason UIN isn't listed as being "on leave"
>is because e clearly isn't on leave -- e's been voting and everything...
>I'm allowed to adjust a player's actions to a game-legal form, subject to
>complaint within three days or so. There was an implied "I'm Off Leave"
>when Wonko first cast votes in UIN's name, several weeks ago.)

Er.  The whole point of the proxy rule was so that votes could be cast for someone who isn't around, isn't it?  Why would the exercise of someone's proxy when e isn't around imply e was in fact around?

Besides, if e's not On Leave, why, in your own proposal, are you trying to give the Scarf to someone "not On Leave"?

Okay, I didn't want to do this with a CFI if it wasn't necessary, but...

I make the following CFI:

Statement: Slumbering Giant 1 ceased to be a player in this game as of nweek 20, nday 1.

Analysis: Slumbering Giant 1 declared emself On Leave on nweek 17, nday 1.  E has not declared emself Off Leave since that point.  Rule 206 states that a player who has been On Leave for more than three consecutive nweeks ceases to be a player.  Therefore, on nweek 20, nday 1, three nweeks of ten ndays each (as per Rule 3) after e declared emself On Leave, Slumbering Giant 1 ceased to be a player.

[[ Note that if this is ruled true, SG1's votes this nweek will need to be retroactively factored out. ]]

						Glotmorf


_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business