Dan Waldron on 1 Jun 2002 07:51:32 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
spoon-business: CFI |
> > > >All right, is r0 invoked or not? And how difficult would it be to fix > >things > >if it is? > > No, because a majority of players need to recognize an emergency before r0 > kicks in. Eight is a majority, and I think we only have six. And you won't have my vote until I am convinced that an emergency exists. At present I believe that the ruleset is entirely playable. We aren't a computer program and there is no need to crash as soon as we get an undefined value. All we need is for the judicial system to make a decision about what happens when we get an undefined value. I appeal CFI 754 I submit the following CFI: {{ Given that the rules exist to be interpreted by intelligent beings, and given that it might, through methods foreseen or unforeseen, become impossible to determine the value of various game values, and given that this has indeed happened, I submit the following statement: No player was awarded a win during nweek 16. My analysis follows. Rule 18/2 states that "With the exception of Rule Changes whatever is not prohibited or regulated by the Ruleset is permitted and unregulated." Indeterminate values are neither prohibited nor regulated. Therefore it is up to us to come to some decision how they shall be dealt with. The simplest means of dealing with an undefined value is to have the answer of any query made of it be "no", and this is the principle I suggest we apply here. I do not suggest that we apply this principle indiscriminately, for example if the rules were to ask "is the value of x indeterminate?" it would be foolish to return an answer of "no" due to precedent if x were indeterminate. However, in present circumstances the principle is quite simple to apply. Rule 27/2 states that "If at any time a player's score equals or exceeds 1000 points, and that player's Charm and Activity are both greater than zero, that player is immediately awarded a Win." The rule asks the question "Is the value of any player's greater than or equal to 1000 points?" In the case of Wonko and others whose score is indeterminate, the answer is "no." Furthermore, rule 440 asks the question "is the global Entropy greater than 500?" since the global Entropy is also indeterminate the answer should also be "no." }} Dan Waldron ICQ 57894467