spoon-business: CFJ - Wonko's comment props

["Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I make a CFJ with this statement:

Wonko's props 650, 651, 652 and 653 did not exist, and should not have been put into effect.

Reason:

Wonko had the Pink Scarf.  Eir gender is set to Drone.

The Scarf rule, R258, reads: "If the player's declared Gender is Drone, the player's posts must include *buzz* and *crackle* strings at random throughout, due to the static electricity effects of the Pink Scarf."

There are large blocks of text in the public forum message that the props in question were quoted from that did not contain static, large enough to suggest the static did not appear "at random throughout", but was left out of those text blocks on purpose.

Since Wonko was required to add the static "at random throughout," and didn't, the message quoted from was not legal; therefore, it should not have been thought to exist for the purpose of quoting from it.  Thus, the props that were quoted from that message that did not exist in a legal sense should not exist either, should not have appeared on the ballot, and should not have been put into effect.