Re: spoon-business: ratings v2.0

Jonathan David Amery on 23 Mar 2002 12:03:39 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-business: ratings v2.0

To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: spoon-business: ratings v2.0
From: Jonathan David Amery <jdamery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 12:03:23 +0000
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 22 Mar 2002 22:55:38 EST." <B8C166E9.F3B%dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <B8C166E9.F3B%dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hmm, ratings...
> > Proposal 473/1: If It's Not Worth Reading At All, It's Not Worth Reading
> > Well (Glotmorf)

 8

> > Proposal 476/0: Oh Baby, You SHOULDN'T Have! (Glotmorf)

 <grins> 9

> > Proposal 481/0: What's Football without Beer? (Glotmorf)

 11

> > Proposal 484/0: Damn Spectators! (Wonko)

 10

> > Proposal 486/0: The Riot Police (Baron von Skippy)

 5

 WC

References:
- spoon-business: ratings v2.0
  - From: Wonko

Prev by Date: spoon-business: Literary critiscism, lack of sleep, and inattentiveness to the rules
Next by Date: spoon-business: The Daily Recognizer (Saturday afternoon)
Previous by thread: spoon-business: ratings v2.0
Next by thread: spoon-business: Literary criticism and lack of sleep
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread