spoon-business: RFJ 28: Ruling

[Antonio <zagarna@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 09:14:04 -0000, you wrote:


>>
>> Statement:
>> 
>> Debts are not Objects as defined by Rule 316/0.
>> 
>> Analysis:
>> 
>> Rule 347/0 states that "Debts are objects" (note the 
>> lowercase spelling of "objects"). Rule 347/0 also states that 
>> "Debts are divisible", but Objects as defined by Rule 316/0 
>> are "indivisible".
>> 
>> I conclude that debts are not Objects as defined by Rule 316/0.

Rule 316/0 takes this in account by stating:"Objects may not be
created, destroyed, or otherwise altered, transferred, or adulterated
except as allowed by the Rules.". As for the spelling it is only a
minor technicality better suited by a motion to trivially amend.
Therefore

I Rule: FALSE

I submit a motion to amend trivially rule 316/0 by replacing the word
"objects" with "Objects"

[[I wonder what would have happened if I had made that a judicial
order instead of a motion to amend trivially"]]
-- 

zagarna

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com