Dan on 9 Mar 2001 16:28:10 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
spoon-business: Re: proposal: let's vote ourselves rich. |
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Jonathan Downes wrote: > SEEING as there is has been a recent spurt of new players, who have few > points, > > AND FURTHER that the current ruleset actively encourages negative voting, > through the opposed minority award (where a negative vote can lead to > points for the voter), the failed proposal penalty (where a negative vote > can lead to points removed from the voters competitor) and the adopted > proposal award (where an affirmative vote gives points to the voters > competitors), > > AND FINALLY that the bank currently has a large surplus of unused points, > I hereby propose the following rule, entitled "let's vote ourselves rich": The Bank is currently running a loss of about 20-50 points per nweek. I see no sign of this changing in the near future unless something is done to get points back from the wealthier players. All it would take just now is a couple of unlucky nweeks where a lot of proposals pass and the award is high and The Bank would be broke again. And the situation is getting worse. Oh dear i feel like a right-wing deficit-paranoid Tory finance minister. We just put taxes up... but we'll reduce spending too. and give tax breaks to the wealthy office-holders. ;-p Poulenc