Bill Jaffe on Tue, 4 Mar 2008 14:54:11 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] Delay for good reason or bad?


Missing the British turn for August.
The escrows for September have not revealed, so I'm assuming someone hasn't
responded.


Bill Jaffe
Wargaming since Tactics (1958), and playing 18xx since 1829
bigbillthecollector@xxxxxxxxx



-----Original Message-----
From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joel
Uckelman
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 4:14 PM
To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
Subject: Re: [eia] Delay for good reason or bad?

Thus spake MICHAEL P GORMAN:
> We were moving along pretty well and just stopped.  Does that mean there
is h
> eated diplomacy ongoing or did I miss a step and everyone is waiting for
me t
> o send something I forgot I need to send?

I don't know what we're waiting for.
 
-- 
J.
_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia