Re: [eia] Delay for good reason or bad?

Joel Uckelman on Tue, 4 Mar 2008 14:14:13 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] Delay for good reason or bad?

To: public list for an Empires in Arms game <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eia] Delay for good reason or bad?
From: Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 22:14:12 +0100
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:09:01 CST." <e532f5046235.47cd660d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thus spake MICHAEL P GORMAN:
> We were moving along pretty well and just stopped.  Does that mean there is h
> eated diplomacy ongoing or did I miss a step and everyone is waiting for me t
> o send something I forgot I need to send?

I don't know what we're waiting for.
 
-- 
J.
_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eia] Delay for good reason or bad?
  - From: Bill Jaffe

References:
- [eia] Delay for good reason or bad?
  - From: MICHAEL P GORMAN

Prev by Date: [eia] Delay for good reason or bad?
Next by Date: Re: [eia] Delay for good reason or bad?
Previous by thread: [eia] Delay for good reason or bad?
Next by thread: Re: [eia] Delay for good reason or bad?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread