Re: [eia] updated map

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Are Economics publically posted or kept private?

Income is publically posted, but expenditures are private.

> Even with a failed economic loss roll, loss of Masovia and +1 economic
> manipulation, Prussia should get +1 manpower. Anyone know if Prussia had 
> any
> saved manpower?
>
> With a failed economic loss roll, no Masovia, no subsidies and normal 
> trade
> (domestic & US), Prussia would of had $29 income. Maintenance for what's 
> on
> the map would be -$6 leaving about $23 left for builds (if any) and
> treasury.

Prussia is not currently receiving domestic trade, and had done Economic 
Manipulation of +2 PP/-$21/-10 mp for March.  Mark never sent in a March 
econ phase, but here's what we thought we would have seen happen:

4 Victory points.
Prussia's base $33 and 17 mp is reduced to $17/9 mp for Economic Loss.
American trade raises this to $23/9 mp.
Economic Manipulation (+2 PP/-$21/-10 mp) brings Prussia's total income to
$2/-1 mp.

Maintenance:
Prussia:  6 corps = $6 maintenance.
(So unless Prussia has at least $4 saved up from previous turns, or can get 
loan money, this is where the country would go bankrupt.)
PSD Adjustment:  +2, to either the highest box in the Instability Zone, or 
if Prussia went bankrupt, to the highest "4" box.

> Saxony & Hesse each would of built 1i factor.

Russia just ceded Hesse to Prussia in March, and so I handled its economics. 
Hesse purchased 2 I and the corps marker.

> Did Prussia set any economic manipulation for next Econ?

You can decide, since Mark never sent econ orders.  Economic Manipulation is 
a public announcement, though.

> Anyway, for April reinforcements Prussia will remove all leaders.
> I can't adjust any corps strengths since I don't have any.
> Did anyone assist the Prussians with land movements or combats? If so, 
> would
> they have any of the corp strengths?
>
> Thanks,
> Mel
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 10:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [eia] updated map
>
>
>> >> Prussian corp strengths
>> >> Pending Prussian reinforcements
>> >> Prussian treasury
>>
>> We honestly don't know these for sure.  We can recreate some of this by
>> looking at the battles from the last war Prussia fought (against Russia
> and
>> Austria), but with the new baby and all I'm finding it hard to put the
> time
>> together to do this.
>>
>> I do think it is safe to say that Prussia got just barely enough money
> last
>> econ turn for maintenance (they failed an economic loss roll), and due to
>> badly-timed economic manipulation, had no manpower coming in.  So there
>> should probably be no reinforcements pending, and unless there were loans
>> from allies, no money in the Prussian treasury.  Not pretty.
>>
>> >> Alliances/Wars/Enforced Peace restrictions
>>
>> Prussia is allied to France (since early in the game) and Russia (just
> since
>> March, 1807).  Is there a Prusso-Spanish alliance ?
>>
>> Prussia surrendered conditionally to Austria and Russia in  January, 
>> 1807.
>> Conditions imposed by Russia were the ceding of Masovia province (Russia
>> chose not to take a minor country) and a 24-month enforced peace. 
>> Austria
>> chose only a Royal Marriage.
>>
>> >> Optional/House Rules being used or not used.
>> >> Rule Agreements/Clarifications
>>
>> Am I right that we are using all optional rules this game ?  Somebody 
>> help
>> me out with specifics about house rules.
>>
>> -JJY
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> eia mailing list
>> eia@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
> 


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia