Re: [eia] Land Phase Order

["Bill Jaffe" <billj@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I accept Joel's logic and change my vote to repatriated.

However, I add the caveat that they cannot ever be used against any Austria
possession or corps... :-)

This means there are now 4 votes for repatriation, so repatriation carries
and we can get on with the French turn.

 

Bill Jaffe

Wargaming since Tactics (1958), and playing 18xx since 1829

billj@patriot. <blocked::mailto:billj@xxxxxxxxxxx> net

 

-----Original Message-----
From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joel
Uckelman
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 3:49 PM
To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
Subject: Re: [eia] Land Phase Order

 

Thus spake "J.J. Young":

> So to restate the question at hand, when Hanover and Hesse changed to

> Russian control during the political phase, should the French garrisons
that

> were besieged in those countries be repatriated, as per the Honors of War

> Rules, or should they have to surrender to the Russians ?  So far, Mike
has

> voted that they surrender, Kyle and I have voted that they are
repatriated.

> Everybody else, please give us your opinion.

> 

> -JJY

 

I think they should be repatriated. The only time garrisons surrender 

is in the context of sieges.

 

 

 

-- 

J.

_______________________________________________

eia mailing list

eia@xxxxxxxxx

http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia