Re: [eia] combined movement

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>]

    Right.  JJ's point is that, since the Political Phase escrow for this 
month has not officially been released, the response you made to the DOW 
escrow doesn't matter anyway.  Just make sure that you correct your response 
to the Political Phase escrow before it is released, and all will be well.

kdh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] combined movement


> The thing is Jim, the escrows arrived in reverse order this month (at 
> least
> for me), so you sent you political orders to the DOW escrow, which is why
> we've all seen them.
>
> -JJY
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 11:35 AM
> Subject: [eia] combined movement
>
>
>> I haven't seen a copy of the political orders yet, but it's been brought
> to
>> my attention that Great Britain failed to offer combined movement to all
>> allies (Turkey, Austria and Russia) as intended and only offered it to
>> Russia.  I assume this was a cut & paste error.  Is anyone opposed to
> Great
>> Britain rectifying this and combining movement as intended?
>>
>> P.S.  Britain also meant to offer an alliance to Turkey (just in case it
>> isn't on there!) and this was the basis for combining movement.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> eia mailing list
>> eia@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia 

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia