Bill Jaffe on Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:18:16 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] Round 3 at 2-1 table, we get a mutual break after all...


I would point out that poor Charles got several bad rolls last time, and
lost 2 Guard in the battle rather than 0, etc...

The dice are making up for bad chit-picking, it's karma...

Bill Jaffe
Wargaming since Tactics (1958), and playing 18xx since 1829
billj@xxxxxxxxxxx
 

-----Original Message-----
From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Michael Gorman
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:26 PM
To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
Subject: Re: [eia] Round 3 at 2-1 table, we get a mutual break after all...

At 11:17 AM 8/11/2006, you wrote:
>3 straight 4s, that's the ticket.
>5% will do 2 more casualties, total of 9 to the French and Neapolitans, but
>there is a mutual break, I'm assuming, and we retreat to Venice? Closest
>depot is Salzburg, Munich, Ulm, and Trieste, all 2 hexes away.

While I still wait for Austria to get a bad roll, I'm sure it will happen 
someday, this retreat does raise an issue.  The forces now at Venice used 
movement as part of forage.  Is it therefore possible for them to besiege 
the city?

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia