Re: [eia] Forcible Access

Michael Gorman on Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:33:04 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] Forcible Access

To: public list for an Empires in Arms game <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eia] Forcible Access
From: Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:32:59 -0500
In-reply-to: <6.1.0.6.0.20060727162314.01b2d780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20060727211521.248AEEAB0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6.1.0.6.0.20060727162314.01b2d780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Huh, it's actually a standard rule in the errata, not an option.  It's in 
10.3, rather than down in optional rules.

Thanks for the link, I like this copy a lot better than my current 
ones.   Some small touch ups in phrasing that make things read a lot cleaner.

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eia] Forcible Access
  - From: Joel Uckelman

References:
- Re: [eia] Forcible Access
  - From: Joel Uckelman
- Re: [eia] Forcible Access
  - From: Michael Gorman

Prev by Date: [eia] Status, July 1806
Next by Date: Re: [eia] Forcible Access
Previous by thread: Re: [eia] Forcible Access
Next by thread: Re: [eia] Forcible Access
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread