Re: [eia] Prussian trade

["James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I see.  You're right, their American trade should be $8.

-----Original Message-----
From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Joel Uckelman
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 3:00 PM
To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
Subject: Re: [eia] Prussian trade


Thus spake "James Helle":
> Joel, you said;
> Prussia should be $8, for Hamburg, not Stettin.
> 
> I'm not sure I understand this sentence.  I show Prussia controlling the
> following;
> Danzig.......0/1
> Konigsburg...1/2
> Stettin......2/3
> Lubeck.......0/1
> Hamburg......3/4
> Copenhagen...1/2
> Christiana...0/1
> ------------------
> TOTAL........7/14
> 
> Am I missing something?

I mean for American trade, Prussia should get $8, not $6, because you
can use Hamburg instead of Stettin (presumably for this econ phase
only, since you said that you intend to free Denmark, and ports for
American trade must be either home or conquered).

-- 
J.
_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia