Re: [eia] Still disagree with Mark & Mark

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Riga and Abo are both 3 sea moves away from the sea space off
Christiana/Hamburg, where the interception combat took place.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "William Jaffe" <billj6203@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "'public list for an Empires in Arms game'" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "'William Jaffe'" <billj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 10:49 AM
Subject: RE: [eia] Still disagree with Mark & Mark


> So to the west are Hull, Newcastle, Edinburgh, all at 2 sea squares, and
no
> protection from the French. At 2 squares east are Riga and Abo, with no
> rampaging French corps.
>
> Guess which way seems better, granted 20-20 hindsight.
>
> Bill Jaffe
> Playing Wargames since 1958, and 18xx since 1829...
> billj6203@xxxxxxxxx
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Michael Gorman
> Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 10:36 AM
> To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
> Subject: RE: [eia] Still disagree with Mark & Mark
>
> At 08:42 AM 3/19/2006, you wrote:
> >No, I don't remember this ever coming up. Frankly, the fleets should have
> >gone to Ireland, where you couldn't have followed, or back to Russia,
where
> >you didn't have corps. Any where else in Britain would lead to this same
> >problem, why borrow the chance of such troubles...
> >
> >If we have to vote, let's get on with it...
> They had limited choices on retreat since nearest friendly port is the
> requirement
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia