William Jaffe on Sun, 19 Mar 2006 16:49:24 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: [eia] Still disagree with Mark & Mark |
So to the west are Hull, Newcastle, Edinburgh, all at 2 sea squares, and no protection from the French. At 2 squares east are Riga and Abo, with no rampaging French corps. Guess which way seems better, granted 20-20 hindsight. Bill Jaffe Playing Wargames since 1958, and 18xx since 1829... billj6203@xxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Gorman Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 10:36 AM To: public list for an Empires in Arms game Subject: RE: [eia] Still disagree with Mark & Mark At 08:42 AM 3/19/2006, you wrote: >No, I don't remember this ever coming up. Frankly, the fleets should have >gone to Ireland, where you couldn't have followed, or back to Russia, where >you didn't have corps. Any where else in Britain would lead to this same >problem, why borrow the chance of such troubles... > >If we have to vote, let's get on with it... They had limited choices on retreat since nearest friendly port is the requirement _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia