William Jaffe on Sun, 19 Mar 2006 16:49:24 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: [eia] Still disagree with Mark & Mark


So to the west are Hull, Newcastle, Edinburgh, all at 2 sea squares, and no
protection from the French. At 2 squares east are Riga and Abo, with no
rampaging French corps.

Guess which way seems better, granted 20-20 hindsight.

Bill Jaffe
Playing Wargames since 1958, and 18xx since 1829...
billj6203@xxxxxxxxx


-----Original Message-----
From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Michael Gorman
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 10:36 AM
To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
Subject: RE: [eia] Still disagree with Mark & Mark

At 08:42 AM 3/19/2006, you wrote:
>No, I don't remember this ever coming up. Frankly, the fleets should have
>gone to Ireland, where you couldn't have followed, or back to Russia, where
>you didn't have corps. Any where else in Britain would lead to this same
>problem, why borrow the chance of such troubles...
>
>If we have to vote, let's get on with it...
They had limited choices on retreat since nearest friendly port is the 
requirement

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia