| William Jaffe on Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:42:55 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| RE: [eia] Still disagree with Mark & Mark |
No, I don't remember this ever coming up. Frankly, the fleets should have gone to Ireland, where you couldn't have followed, or back to Russia, where you didn't have corps. Any where else in Britain would lead to this same problem, why borrow the chance of such troubles... If we have to vote, let's get on with it... Bill Jaffe Playing Wargames since 1958, and 18xx since 1829... billj6203@xxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joel Uckelman Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 9:30 AM To: public list for an Empires in Arms game Subject: Re: [eia] Still disagree with Mark & Mark Thus spake "William Jaffe": > > Do we simply vote, or is there a Higher Authority we can get to make a > ruling and then simply move on. > > Bill Jaffe You said that you were involved with the EiA tournament at AvalonCon? Did this issue ever come up there? I don't know what higher authority we could consult on this, AH being dead, EiH having the rule in dispute verbatim, there being no official erratum covering it, and seeing it mentioned as a point of conflict in some unofficial errata. I think we should take a vote. -- J. _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia