Re: [eia] Not true, see 6.3.1.1, it's explicit, France is the attacker.

Joel Uckelman on Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:05:59 -0600 (CST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] Not true, see 6.3.1.1, it's explicit, France is the attacker.

To: public list for an Empires in Arms game <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eia] Not true, see 6.3.1.1, it's explicit, France is the attacker.
From: Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:05:58 +0100
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:54:51 EST." <07fd01c647ba$4eafa1a0$6b01a8c0@tfilmore>

Thus spake "William Jaffe":
> Not true, the blockaded fleets attempt to flee the port, thereby setting up
> an interception, the rules are actually explicit, and France is the
> attacker.

Ok, I see where we disagree now---I think that 6.2.6.1 constitutes an
exception to 6.2.3.2.1, and you do not.

-- 
J.
_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

Follow-Ups:
- [eia] my vote
  - From: Kyle H

References:
- [eia] Not true, see 6.3.1.1, it's explicit, France is the attacker.
  - From: William Jaffe

Prev by Date: [eia] Interception after Fleets are forced from a port
Next by Date: [eia] Re: Not true, see 6.3.1.1, it's explicit, France is the attacker.
Previous by thread: [eia] Not true, see 6.3.1.1, it's explicit, France is the attacker.
Next by thread: [eia] my vote
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread