RE: [eia] British sortie

Michael Gorman on Wed, 23 Nov 2005 23:11:02 -0600 (CST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: [eia] British sortie

To: public list for an Empires in Arms game <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [eia] British sortie
From: Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 23:10:51 -0600
In-reply-to: <NFEPLOEKBOBJNBDJKIGEEEGCCFAA.jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <000a01c5f040$58cbeda0$99a68840@giskard> <NFEPLOEKBOBJNBDJKIGEEEGCCFAA.jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

At 04:00 PM 11/23/2005, you wrote:

London is undergarrisoned.  This is a good point, JJ.  The siege table
specifically states that a sortie is allowed on a "-1 to 1" roll, indicating
that sorties can only be undertaken by garrisons that are _not
undergarrisoned_.  I think the group has probably been handling this wrong
in the past (but am not really interested in researching the archives to
verify this).

Therefore, France will not lose a factor to the British sortie as I agree
this was an illegitimate maneuver.

A fortified and under garrisoned city can sortie as the fortificationmodifier cancels the under garrisoned modifier.


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

References:
- RE: [eia] British sortie
  - From: James Helle

Prev by Date: RE: [eia] British sortie
Next by Date: RE: [eia] British sortie
Previous by thread: RE: [eia] British sortie
Next by thread: RE: [eia] British sortie
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread