Re: [eia] Austrian PSD movement in February

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I did include it, but I mistakenly gave the city name of Bologna instead of
the country name of Romanga.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] Austrian PSD movement in February


>     What about the Austrian loss of Romagna?  That's another -1 PP.  That
> puts them in the second to last Instability Zone box as of the end of
March
> (which is what my image was trying to show).
>
> kdh
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 9:36 AM
> Subject: [eia] Austrian PSD movement in February
>
>
> Austria started that month in the highest "7" box.
>
> +1 PP was gained for the siege battle at Munich.
>
> +1 was gained for the relief Battle of Magdeburg
>
> -1 PP is lost for the relief Battle of Wittenburg
>
> -8 PPs were lost for the conquest of Berg, Bologna, Hesse, Kleves,
> Palatinate, Papacy, Venetia, and Wurttemburg.
>
> This net change of -7 PPs (unless I've missed anything) brings Austria to
> the highest box in the Instability Zone, and then their alliance with
Spain
> brings them to the lowest Neutral Zone box, where Austria should be now.
> This avoids the transfer of Baden until its possible conquest at the end
of
> March.
>
> -JJY
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia